Wilson, E, Free, C, Morris, TP, Syred, J, Ahamed, I, Menon-Johansson, AS, Palmer, MJ, Barnard, S, Rezel, E and Baraitser, P. 2017. S1 Data for "Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial". [Online]. PLOS Medicine. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002479
Wilson, E, Free, C, Morris, TP, Syred, J, Ahamed, I, Menon-Johansson, AS, Palmer, MJ, Barnard, S, Rezel, E and Baraitser, P. S1 Data for "Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial" [Internet]. PLOS Medicine; 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002479
Wilson, E, Free, C, Morris, TP, Syred, J, Ahamed, I, Menon-Johansson, AS, Palmer, MJ, Barnard, S, Rezel, E and Baraitser, P (2017). S1 Data for "Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial". [Data Collection]. PLOS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002479
Description
Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection testing (e-STI testing) is increasingly available as an alternative to testing in clinics. Typically this testing modality enables users to order a test kit from a virtual service (via a website or app), collect their own samples, return test samples to a laboratory, and be notified of their results by short message service (SMS) or telephone. e-STI testing is assumed to increase access to testing in comparison with face-to-face services, but the evidence is unclear. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of an e-STI testing and results service (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, HIV, and syphilis) on STI testing uptake and STI cases diagnosed.
| Description of data capture | The study took place in the London boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark. Between 24 November 2014 and 31 August 2015, we recruited 2,072 participants, aged 16–30 years, who were resident in these boroughs, had at least 1 sexual partner in the last 12 months, stated willingness to take an STI test, and had access to the internet. Those unable to provide consent and unable to read English were excluded. Participants were randomly allocated to receive 1 text message with the web link of an e-STI testing and results service (intervention group) or to receive 1 text message with the web link of a bespoke website listing the locations, contact details, and websites of 7 local sexual health clinics (control group). Participants were free to use any other services or interventions during the study period. The primary outcomes were self-reported STI testing at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks, and self-reported STI diagnosis at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants prescribed treatment for an STI, time from randomisation to completion of an STI test, and time from randomisation to treatment of an STI. Participants were sent a £10 cash incentive on submission of self-reported data. We completed all follow-up, including patient record checks, by 17 June 2016. Uptake of STI testing was increased in the intervention group at 6 weeks (50.0% versus 26.6%, relative risk [RR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.15, P < 0.001). The proportion of participants diagnosed was 2.8% in the intervention group versus 1.4% in the control group (RR 2.10, 95% CI 0.94 to 4.70, P = 0.079). No evidence of heterogeneity was observed for any of the pre-specified subgroup analyses. The proportion of participants treated was 1.1% in the intervention group versus 0.7% in the control group (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.71 to 4.16, P = 0.231). Time to test, was shorter in the intervention group compared to the control group (28.8 days versus 36.5 days, P < 0.001, test for difference in restricted mean survival time [RMST]), but no differences were observed for time to treatment (83.2 days versus 83.5 days, P = 0.51, test for difference in RMST). We were unable to recruit the planned 3,000 participants and therefore lacked power for the analyses of STI diagnoses and STI cases treated. | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data capture method | Questionnaire: Fixed form - Web-based, Experiment | ||||||||||||
| Date (Published in a 3rd party system) | 27 December 2017 | ||||||||||||
| Geographical area covered |
|
||||||||||||
| Language(s) of written materials | English |
| Data Creators | Wilson, E, Free, C, Morris, TP, Syred, J, Ahamed, I, Menon-Johansson, AS, Palmer, MJ, Barnard, S, Rezel, E and Baraitser, P |
|---|---|
| LSHTM Faculty/Department | Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- ) |
| Participating Institutions | London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom |
| Funders |
|
|---|
| Date Deposited | 03 Jan 2018 10:34 |
|---|---|
| Last Modified | 25 Nov 2024 16:29 |
| Publisher | PLOS Medicine |
