The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME).

Chandler, CORCID logo, Webb, ELORCID logo, Maiteki-Sebuguzi, C, Nayiga, S, Nabirye, C, Diliberto, D, Ssemmondo, E, Dorsey, G, Kamya, MR and Staedke, SGORCID logo (2017). The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME). [Dataset]. Figshare. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.
Copy

Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs) have been scaled-up widely across Africa. The PRIME study evaluated an intervention aiming to improve fever case management using mRDTs at public health centers in Uganda. A cluster-randomized trial was conducted from 2010-13 in Tororo, a high malaria transmission setting. Twenty public health centers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control. The intervention included training in health center management, fever case management with mRDTs, and patient-centered services; plus provision of mRDTs and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) when stocks ran low. Three rounds of Interviews were conducted with caregivers of children under five years of age as they exited health centers (N = 1400); reference mRDTs were done in children with fever (N = 1336). Health worker perspectives on mRDTs were elicited through semi-structured questionnaires (N = 49) and in-depth interviews (N = 10). The primary outcome was inappropriate treatment of malaria, defined as the proportion of febrile children who were not treated according to guidelines based on the reference mRDT. There was no difference in inappropriate treatment of malaria between the intervention and control arms (24.0% versus 29.7%, adjusted risk ratio 0.81 95\% CI: 0.56, 1.17 p = 0.24). Most children (76.0\%) tested positive by reference mRDT, but many were not prescribed AL (22.5\% intervention versus 25.9\% control, p = 0.53). Inappropriate treatment of children testing negative by reference mRDT with AL was also common (31.3\% invention vs 42.4\% control, p = 0.29). Health workers appreciated mRDTs but felt that integrating testing into practice was challenging given constraints on time and infrastructure. The PRIME intervention did not have the desired impact on inappropriate treatment of malaria for children under five. In this high transmission setting, use of mRDTs did not lead to the reductions in antimalarial prescribing seen elsewhere. Broader investment in health systems, including infrastructure and staffing, will be required to improve fever case management.

Keywords

Fever, Case management, Malaria, Health center management

S1_Prime_Protocol_v1.1.pdf
subject
Documentation
Creative Commons: Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
info
Original study protocol for the PRIME cluster-randomized trial. Approved by the overseeing ethics committees. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.s001
picture_as_pdf
application/pdf
folder_info
7MB

View Download
S2_Prime_Protocol_v1.7.pdf
subject
Documentation
Creative Commons: Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
info
Final version of the PRIME cluster-randomized trial study protocol, incorporating all amendments approved by the overseeing ethics committees. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.s002
picture_as_pdf
application/pdf
folder_info
6MB

View Download
S3_PROCESS_Protocol_v.1.1.pdf
subject
Documentation
Creative Commons: Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
info
Original version of the PROCESS study protocol which ran alongside the PRIME cluster-randomized trial. Approved by the overseeing ethics committees. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.s003
picture_as_pdf
application/pdf
folder_info
2MB

View Download
S4_PROCESS_Protocol_v1.3.pdf
subject
Documentation
Creative Commons: Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
info
Final version of PROCESS study protocol, which ran alongside the PRIME cluster randomized trial. This incorporates all amendments approved by the overseeing ethics committees. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.s004
picture_as_pdf
application/pdf
folder_info
3MB

View Download
S5_FCM_Module_Delivery.docx
subject
Documentation
Creative Commons: Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
info
Delivery of fever case management (FCM) module in the PRIME study. DOI: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.s005
description
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
folder_info
28kB

Download
S6_Heath_Worker_questionnaire.docx
subject
Study Instrument
Creative Commons: Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
info
Self-filled questionnaire completed by health workers 10 months after the initial intervention training. Data was used to represent the confidence health workers had in areas covered by the training and supervision. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.s006
description
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
folder_info
19kB

Download
S7_CONSORT_2010_Checklist.docx
subject
Documentation
Creative Commons: Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
info
Checklist of information to include when reporting a cluster-randomized trial, indicating where specific items are reported within the paper. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.s007
description
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
folder_info
30kB

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core (with Type as Type) MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads