Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB Regimens: TB-Practecal economic evaluation sub-study

Sweeney, SORCID logo and Kitson, N (2020). Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB Regimens: TB-Practecal economic evaluation sub-study. [Collection]. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 10.17037/DATA.00001797.
Copy

Current treatment regimens for MDR-TB are long, poorly tolerated, and have poor outcomes. Furthermore, the costs of treating MDR-TB are much greater than those for treating drug-susceptible TB, both for health service and patient-incurred costs. Urgent action is needed to identify short, effective, tolerable and cheaper treatments for people with both quinolone-susceptible and quinolone-resistant MDR-TB. PRACTECAL-EE is a sub-study alongside a clinical trial (TB-PRACTECAL) aiming to assess the costs to patients and providers of new regimens, as well as their cost-effectiveness and impact on participant poverty levels. This sub-study is based on data from the three countries participating in the main trial. Primary cost data will be collected from the provider and patient perspectives, following economic best practice. We will estimate the probability that new MDR-TB regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid are cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared to the standard of care for MDR-TB patients in Uzbekistan, South Africa, and Belarus. Analysis uses a Markov model populated with primary cost and outcome data collected at each study site. We will also estimate the impact of new regimens on prevalence of catastrophic patient costs due to TB.

No files available. Please consult associated links.


Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core (with Type as Type) MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads