Matrika Household Survey in India
Powell-Jackson, T
, Tougher, S, Dutt, V, Shreya, P, Haldar, K, Shulka, V, Singh, K, Kumar, P, Fabbri, C and Goodman, C
(2017).
Matrika Household Survey in India.
[Dataset].
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
10.17037/DATA.263.
, Tougher, S, Dutt, V, Shreya, P, Haldar, K, Shulka, V, Singh, K, Kumar, P, Fabbri, C and Goodman, C
(2017).
Matrika Household Survey in India.
[Dataset].
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
10.17037/DATA.263.
Data produced as part of a study to evaluate the impact of the Matrika social franchising model – a multi-faceted intervention that established a network of private providers and strengthened the skills of both public and private sector clinicians – and determine whether it has improved the quality and coverage of health services along the continuum of care for maternal, newborn and reproductive health in Uttar Pradesh, India. The datasets cover two rounds of a household survey, performed in January 2015 and May 2016, of women who had recently given birth.
Additional Information
Data are available on request for research purposes only and on the condition that no attempt is made to identify study participants.
Keywords
Maternal health, Newborn health, Social franchising| Item Type | Dataset |
|---|---|
| Description of data capture | Data were collected during household interviews using CAPI (computer assisted personal interviewing) by staff of Sambodhi Research and Communications. The household survey was administered to women as a repeated cross-section in January 2015 (round 1) and May 2016 (round 2). Women were selected from the same clusters in each round. Eligible respondents included all women who gave birth in the previous 24 months (round 1) or 18 months (round 2), including those who had a stillbirth or whose child died since birth. Eligible women were identified through a census of households, conducted one month before the household survey round. Every member of the household was listed and then, for women aged 15 to 49 years, a series of questions probed whether she gave birth to a baby that was born alive, born dead or lost before birth. Using this sampling frame, eligible women in each cluster were randomly selected for interview. The household survey tool included the following modules: (1) household listing, (2) general healthcare interactions, (3) household characteristics, (4) wellbeing of husband, (5) pregnancy history, (6) family planning and antenatal care, (7) delivery and postnatal care, (8) child health, (9) interactions with community health workers, (10) information and perceptions of healthcare, and (11) wellbeing, mental health and physical health. The study involved the selection of three types of clusters: 1) ‘intervention’ clusters with a Sky provider; 2) ‘internal comparison’ clusters with no social franchisee in the three intervention districts; 3) ‘external comparison’ clusters in three neighbouring districts where the social franchise model was not operating. Study clusters were selected one year after the first social franchisee was contracted using the following procedures. First, every Sky health provider was linked to its census area. At the time of selection there were 393 private providers in the network. This process identified 216 possible intervention clusters from which 60 clusters were selected at random. Second, internal comparison clusters were selected by matching without replacement the intervention clusters to 60 comparison areas within the same three districts. We performed exact matching on district and urban residences, and then within each strata, selected pairs of clusters with the smallest distance based on a Mahalanobis metric that was computed using census data on village characteristics (total population, % under 6 years, % females under 6 years, % female literate females, % scheduled tribe, % scheduled caste, % cultivator, and % “other” workers). To limit problems of contamination, comparison clusters adjacent to intervention areas could not be selected. Finally, the same matching procedure was performed to select 60 external comparison clusters from neighbouring districts. |
| Capture method | Interview: Face-to-face - CAPI |
| Collection Period |
From To 2015 2017 |
| Date | 9 October 2017 |
| Geographical area covered (offline during plugin upgrade) |
North Latitude East Longitude South Latitude West Longitude 27.374 81.8525 25.9702 79.7322 |
| Language(s) of written materials | English, Hindi |
| Creator(s) |
Powell-Jackson, T, Tougher, S, Dutt, V, Shreya, P, Haldar, K, Shulka, V, Singh, K, Kumar, P, Fabbri, C and Goodman, C
|
| Associated roles | Powell-Jackson, T (Principal Investigator) |
| LSHTM Faculty/Department | Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Global Health and Development |
| Research Centre | Centre for Maternal, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH) |
| Research Group | Maternal healthcare markets Evaluation Team (MET) |
| Participating Institutions | London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, Sambodhi Research and Communications, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India |
| Funders |
Project Funder Grant Number Funder URI Evaluation of the Matrika Social Franchising Programme in Uttar Pradesh, India UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED |
| Date Deposited | 09 Oct 2017 11:45 |
| Last Modified | 27 Apr 2022 18:19 |
| Publisher | London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine |
UserGuide.html
-
subject - Documentation
- Creative Commons: Attribution
- Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
-
info - User guide for dataset
html - text/html
- folder_info
- 9kB
hh_survey_round1_codebook.html
-
subject - Documentation
- Creative Commons: Attribution
- Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
-
info - Codebook for household survey round 1 dataset
html - text/html
- folder_info
- 574kB
hh_survey_round2_codebook.html
-
subject - Documentation
- Creative Commons: Attribution
- Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
-
info - Codebook for household survey round 2 dataset
html - text/html
- folder_info
- 488kB
hh_survey_round1_questionnaire.pdf
-
subject - Study Instrument
- Creative Commons: Attribution
- Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
-
info - Household survey tool used in Round 1 of the household survey
picture_as_pdf - application/pdf
- folder_info
- 1MB
hh_survey_round2_questionnaire.pdf
-
subject - Study Instrument
- Creative Commons: Attribution
- Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
-
info - Household survey tool used in Round 2 of the household survey
picture_as_pdf - application/pdf
- folder_info
- 1MB
hh_survey_round1_and_2.zip
-
subject - Data
-
lock - Restricted to Request access for all
- Data Sharing Agreement
- Available under Data Sharing Agreement
-
info - Datasets for the 1st (Jan 2015) and 2nd round (May 2016) of the household survey. Data made available on request for research purposes only and on condition that no attempt is made to identify study participants
folder_zip - application/zip
- folder_info
- 244B
Downloads
