4807 58 18309 2 102430 document 18309 Interview_topic_guide.pdf application/pdf 2a6c7526231b5cf5276dd6837ebf5b80bb4c6f66daa7f9b1bbb29b6a5643533d SHA256 209435 2025-09-04 16:14:42 https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4807/2/Interview_topic_guide.pdf 4807 2 2 application/pdf Text en public cc_by_4

Interview_topic_guide.pdf

study_instrument indefinite Framework outlining questions covered in key informant interviews 18310 2 102432 document 18310 Disability_Consent_Information.pdf application/pdf 09826b3755b5d50a8f04ab1aec96dbd07ab716c880bfbab278747a53a8277336 SHA256 249436 2025-09-04 16:14:49 https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4807/3/Disability_Consent_Information.pdf 4807 3 3 application/pdf Text en public cc_by_4

Disability_Consent_Information.pdf

documentation indefinite Participant information sheet and consent form for Key-Informant Interviews 18311 4 102440 document 18311 Interview_transcripts.zip application/zip 9bc28408c06c427ec5cb5b933bc16e302d775f76376e16233308d1652c6563b7 SHA256 251 2025-09-04 17:01:26 https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4807/4/Interview_transcripts.zip 4807 4 1 application/zip Dataset en staffonly datasharingagreement

Interview_transcripts.zip

data 10 Transcripts of 12 interviews performed with research participants 18401 1 103678 document 18401 indexcodes.txt text/plain 96fde7e40289794846486dc2fd5b5332f8d68f29b52a7e55efe7ef6ac45319a5 SHA256 1617 2025-09-29 09:44:13 https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4807/5/indexcodes.txt 4807 5 5 text/plain other en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/document/18309 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/document/18309 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/document/18309 indefinite Generate index codes conversion from Text to indexcodes 18402 1 103679 document 18402 indexcodes.txt text/plain 45e583457badd2fa714973d68a2556e72079eca967f0947421c24cab2fe92463 SHA256 2658 2025-09-29 09:44:13 https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4807/6/indexcodes.txt 4807 6 6 text/plain other en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/document/18310 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/document/18310 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/document/18310 indefinite Generate index codes conversion from Text to indexcodes archive 253 disk0/00/00/48/07 2025-09-05 08:49:03 2026-04-20 13:49:51 2025-09-05 08:49:03 data_collection show Fulford Katie TRUE Delacey Emily 0000-0003-2286-6430 TRUE 82a6bd1f1278ce79de3903bd28d494a3 Beckerlegge Fiona 0000-0001-8088-4683 FALSE Hayes Julia 0000-0001-5578-5659 FALSE De Silva Himali FALSE Kerac Marko 0000-0002-3745-7317 TRUE 61a21cb3b0076f9b33d28fc469e5a0b9 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom Holt International, United States Mary Sheridan Centre for Child Health, London, United Kingdom Kyaninga Child Development Centre, Uganda EPPH Disability Guidelines Qualitative interviews Nutrition Researchers wishing to access the interview transcripts are invited to complete a data application form, outlining their proposed research. Access will be provided, subject to the signing of a Data Transfer Agreement that outlines conditions for secure storage and citation. Children with disabilities are often excluded in nutrition policy, programming and practice. A recently established “Feeding and Disability Resource Bank” collated currently available guidelines and training materials relevant to this group. It forms an important baseline for improved future guidelines and training materials to better support nutrition among children with disabilities. The primary objective of this study was to analyse guidance, existing training materials, programme packages and programmatic guidelines. Semi-structured key-informant interviews were conducted to identify priority areas for improvement of the resources, and to place findings in context with the main barriers and facilitators to their use. This dataset includes transcripts of key informant interviews performed with twelve public health professionals. 2025-09-03 completed London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 10.17037/DATA.00004807 Dataset London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom XMCH Nutrition Group Interview.WebBased restricted London, United Kingdom Dataset Qualitative The primary objective of the study was a thematic analysis of training materials, program packages and programmatic guidance related to supporting nutritional care for children with disabilities. The analysis was complemented with semi-structured key-informant interviews to help identify priority areas for improvement of the resources, and to place findings in context with the main barriers and facilitators to their use. A phenomenological approach was adopted to explore the key-informants real world experience of accessing and implementing these resources. A mixture of purposive and snowball sampling was used to email and invite professionals to share their expertise in a key-informant interview. Key-informants were selected based on experience at either program or policy level (ideally also with experience of front-line work) to achieve an overview of current global practice. The selection criteria aimed to identify experts from the field of nutrition or disability who also have the unique experience of managing the overlap of the two. Key-informants were selected to represent a variety of different professional backgrounds, sectors, and geographies. Purposive sampling started with 4 participants, and the remaining key-informants were snowball sampled until a sense of saturation was felt. The interviews were semi-structured in nature, following a topic guide that covered all three objectives. The questions aimed to further explore the strengths and weaknesses of the resources available, the barriers and facilitators to their implementation, and finally identify priority areas for development of the literature. Early findings from the thematic analysis were used to refine the topic guide. The interviews were conducted via Zoom from the interviewers and key-informant’s home or work space. Meetings were recorded and transcribed using Zoom’s own closed caption software. The transcriptions were checked and edited on Microsoft Word by the interviewer, using audio recording of the meeting. Transcripts were made anonymous through the removal of any identifiable information and categorisation of job roles, projects, locations and organisations. en 2024-07-09 2024-08-07 https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4681975